U.K. and Ecuador Conspire to Deliver Julian Assange to U.S. Authorities

by Gareth Porter, Nov 26, 2018



Ecuadorians hold up pictures of Julian Asssange in a show of support at the Government Palace in Quito, Ecuador, on Oct. 31, 2018. (Dolores Ochoa / AP)

The accidental revelation in mid-November that U.S. federal prosecutors had secretly filed charges against WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange underlines the determination of the Trump administration to end AssangeÕs asylum in the Ecuadorian Embassy in London, where he has been staying since 2012.

Behind the revelation of those secret charges for supposedly threatening U.S. national security is a murky story of a political ploy by the Ecuadorian and British governments to create a phony rationale for ousting Assange from the embassy. The two regimes agreed to base their plan on the claim that Assange was conspiring to flee to Russia.

Trump and his aides applauded Assange and WikiLeaks during the 2016 election campaign for spreading embarrassing revelations about Hillary ClintonÕs campaign via leaked DNC emails. But all that changed abruptly in March 2017 when WikiLeaks released thousands of pages of CIA documents describing the CIAÕs hacking tools and techniques. The batch of documents published by WikiLeaks did not release the actual ÒarmedÓ malware deployed by the CIA. But the ÒVault 7Ó leak, as WikiLeaks dubbed it, did show how those tools allowed the agency to break into smartphones, computers and internet-connected televisions anywhere in the worldÑand even to make it look like those hacks were done by another intelligence service.

The CIA and the national security state reacted to the Vault 7 release by targeting Assange for arrest and prosecution. On March 9, 2017, Vice President Mike Pence called the leak tantamount to Òtrafficking in national security informationÓ and threatened to Òuse the full force of the law and resources of the United States to hold all of those to account that were involved.Ó


Then came a significant change of government in EcuadorÑan April 2, 2017, runoff election that brought centrist Lenin Moreno to power. MorenoÕs win brought to an end the 10-year tenure of the popular leftist President Rafael Correa, who had granted Assange political asylum. For his part, Moreno is eager to join the neoliberal economic system, making his government highly vulnerable to U.S. economic and political influence.

Eleven days after MorenoÕs election, CIA Director Mike Pompeo resumed the attack on Assange. He accused WikiLeaks of being a Òhostile non-state intelligence service.Ó That was the first indication that the U.S. national security state intends to seek a conviction of Assange under the authoritarian Espionage Act of 1917, which would require the government to show that WikiLeaks did more than merely publish material.

A week later, then-Attorney General Jeff Sessions announced that arresting Julian Assange was a Òpriority.Ó The Justice Department was reportedly working on a memo detailing possible charges against WikiLeaks and Assange, including accusations that he had violated the Espionage Act.

On Oct. 20, 2017, Pompeo lumped WikiLeaks together with al-Qaida and Islamic State, arguing that all of them Òlook and feel like very good intelligence organizations.Ó Pompeo said, Ò[W]e are working to take down that threat to the United States.Ó

MorenoÕs Government Under Pressure

During this time, the Ecuadorian foreign ministry was negotiating with Assange on a plan in which he would be granted Ecuadorian citizenship and diplomatic credentials, so that he could be sent to another Ecuadorian embassy in a country friendly to Assange. The Ecuadorian government reached formal agreement with Assange to that effect, and Assange was granted citizenship on Dec. 12, 2017.

But the U.K. Foreign and Commonwealth Office, which was responsive to U.S. wishes, refused to recognize AssangeÕs diplomatic credentials. The foreign office stated that Ecuador Òknows that the way to resolve this issue is for Julian Assange to leave the embassy to face justice.Ó On Dec. 29, 2017, the Ecuadorian government withdrew AssangeÕs diplomatic credentials.

The Trump administration then took a more aggressive stance toward Assange and the policy of the Moreno government. Under Secretary of State for Political Affairs Thomas A. Shannon Jr.Êvisited Ecuador in late February 2018, and he was followed in March by the deputy commander of the U.S. Southern Command, Gen. Joseph DiSalvo, whose task was to discuss security cooperation with the Ecuadorian military leadership.

The day after DiSalvoÕs visit, the Ecuadorian government took its first major action to curtail AssangeÕs freedom in the London embassy. Claiming that Assange had violated a written commitment, reached in December 2017, that he not Òissue messages that implied interference in relation to other states,Ó Ecuadorian officials cut off his access to the internet and imposed a ban on virtually all visitors.Ê The governmentÕs statement alluded to AssangeÕs meeting with two leaders of the Catalan independence movement and his public statement of support for the movement in November 2017, which had provoked the anger of the Spanish government.

EcuadorÕs economic situation offered further opportunity for U.S. leverage at that time. The steep drop in the price of EcuadorÕs oil exports had caused the South American nationÕs politically sensitive domestic fiscal deficit to increase rapidly.Ê In mid-June of 2018 an International Monetary Fund delegation made the organizationÕs first trip to Quito in many years in an effort to review the problem. A report by J.P. Morgan released immediately after the IMFÕs mission suggested that it was now likely that the Moreno government would seek a loan from the IMF. The regime had previously sought to avoid such a move, because it would create potential domestic political difficulties. Seeking an IMF loan would make Ecuador more dependent than before on political support from the United States.

On the heels of that IMF visit, Vice President Pence traveled to Ecuador in June and delivered a blunt political message. An unnamed White House official issued a statement confirming that Pence had Òraised the issue of Mr. AssangeÓ with Moreno and that the two governments had Òagreed to remain in close coordination on potential next steps going forward.Ó

In late July 2018, Moreno, then in Madrid, confirmed that he was involved in negotiations with the U.K. government on the issue of AssangeÕs status. The InterceptÕs Glenn Greenwald reported that a source close to the Ecuadorian foreign ministry and the presidentÕs office had warned privately that the two administrations were close to an agreement that would hand Assange over to the U.K. government. He reported further that it would depend on unidentified assurances from the United States.

The Tale of a Secret Plot Linking Assange With Russia

On Sept. 21, 2018, The Guardian published an article titled ÒRevealed: RussiaÕs secret plan to help Julian Assange escape from the UK.Ó In that story, Guardian reporters Stephanie Kirchgaessner, Dan Collyns and Luke Harding asserted that Russia had devised a plot to ÒsmuggleÓ Assange out of the embassy in a diplomatic car and then whisk him out of the U.K. The authors also claimed that Moscow had negotiated the alleged plot with a close Ecuadorian confidant of Assange and suggested that the scheme raised Ònew questions about AssangeÕs ties to the Kremlin.Ó

But the story was an obvious fabrication, intended to justify the agreement to deprive Assange of his asylum in the embassy by linking himÊwith the Kremlin. The only alleged evidence it offered was the claim by unidentified sources that the former Ecuadorian consul on London and confidant of Assange, Fidel Narvaez, had Òserved as a point of contact with MoscowÓ on the escape planÑa claim that the Narvaez had flatly denied.

A second Guardian piece published five days later implicitly acknowledged the fictitious nature of the first. It failed to even mention the earlier articleÕs claim that the Russians had concocted a plan to get Assange out of the embassy secretly. Instead theÊarticle, by Dan Collyns, cited a Òclassified document signed by EcuadorÕs then-Deputy Foreign Minister Jose Luis JacomeÓ that showed the foreign ministry had assigned Assange to serve in the embassy in Moscow. But the author acknowledged that he had not seen the document, relying instead on a claim by Ecuadorian opposition politician Paola Vintimilla that she had seen it.

In a Sept. 28, 2018, story for ABC News, reporters James Gordon Meek, Sean Langan and Aicha El Hammar Castano reported that ABC had Òreviewed and authenticatedÓ Ecuadorian documents, including a Dec. 19, 2017, directive from the foreign ministry on posting Assange in Moscow. They noted, however, that the documents Òdid not indicate whether Assange knew of the Ecuadorean directive at the time.ÓÊ The ABC story relied on unnamed Ecuadorian officials who, the reporters said, had ÒconfirmedÓ the authenticity of those documents.

Former U.K. Ambassador Craig Murray, who had been forced out of the British diplomatic corps in 2004 for havingÊhaving refused to recant his reporting about rampant torture by the Karimov regime in Uzbekistan that was then supplying the United States with military bases, was a close friend of Assange and was helping him during the negotiations on a diplomatic post. ÒI was asked to undertake negotiations with a number of governments on receiving [Assange], which I did intensively from December to February last year,Ó Murray recalled in an email. ÒJulian instructed me which governments to approach and specifically and definitively stated he did not wish to go to Russia.Ó

Although Murray would not identify the countries with which he had conversations about Assange, his blog and social media postings between December 2017 and March 2018 show that he had traveled to Turkey, Canada, Cuba, Jordan and Qatar.

Murray also said that, to his knowledge, Assange had never been informed of any proposed assignment in Moscow. ÒNeither the Ecuadorian Embassy, with whom I was working closely, nor Julian ever mentioned to me that Ecuador was organizing a diplomatic appointment to Russia,Ó Murray said. According to the former ambassador, the Ecuadorian Embassy correspondence with the British Foreign Office, which the embassy shared with him, did not mention a posting to Russia.

Murray believes that there are only two possible explanations for those reported documents. The first is the Ecuadorian government was working on its own plan for Assange to go to Russia without telling him, and Òintended to present it as a fait accompli.Ó But the more likely explanation, Murray said, Òis that the documents have been retrospectively faked by the Moreno government to try and discredit Julian and prepare for his expulsion, as part of MorenoÕs widespread moves to ingratiate himself with the USA and UK.Ó

On Oct. 12, the Moreno government took a further step toward stripping Assange of asylum status by issuing a ÒSpecial ProtocolÓ that prohibits him from any activities that could be Òconsidered as political or interfering with the internal affairs of other states.Ó It further required all journalists, lawyers and anyone else who wanted to meet with Assange to disclose social media usernames and the serial number and IMEI codes of their cellphones and tablets. And it stated that that personal information could be shared with Òother agencies,Ó according to the memorandum reported by The Guardian.

In response, AssangeÕs lawyers initiated a suit against the Ecuadorian foreign minister, Jose Valencia, for Òisolating and muzzling him.Ó But it was yet another sign of the efforts by both the British and Ecuadorian governments to justify a possible move to take away AssangeÕs protection from extradition to the United States.

When and whether that will happen remains unclear. What is not in doubt, however, is that the Ecuadorian and British governments, working on behalf of the Trump administration, are trying to make it as difficult as possible for Julian Assange to avoid extradition by staying in the Ecuadorian Embassy.

----------------

Gareth Porter is an independent investigative journalist, historian and author who has covered U.S. wars and interventions in Iraq, Pakistan, Afghanistan, Iran, Yemen and Syria since 2004 and was the 2012


================================

This is my cached version of the original

Version: 29 Nov. 2018

Address of this page

Home

Joachim Gruber